Jack FM is a music-radio format devised in America and, owing to our lack of originality in the UK, copied in its original form wholesale.
The Jack FM format is simple: There are no radio DJs (or presenters). The songs play out like somebody’s just plugged their iPod in and left it switched to random. The difference being that an iPod doesn’t have dreary long commercial breaks or play out ‘sweepers’ saying ‘iPod!!!’ between every song.
This no presenter / DJ format seems to be gaining in popularity, with the latest audience research (assuming the ancient methodology in use to do the research actually works) showing huge gains in the listening figures for Jack FM radio stations around the UK.
I can’t lie and say I’m happy about this. I still believe that the essential ‘hook’ for music-radio is the presenter / DJ. It’s definitely the case when it comes to youth and new music, as the pirates, Radio 1 and 1Xtra easily demonstrate.
Sadly, general ‘pop’ and ‘oldies’ don’t seem to need ‘presentation’ any more. Music-radio audiences are now just happy to hear a stream of songs playing one after the other without any hook or continuity or glue sticking them all together.
The journey to ‘educate’ the listening public to hate the DJ has been a fairly long and deliberate one. Strangely, it has been one undertaken by the bosses of the very commercial radio sector itself.
It started when the radio bosses sat down with the accountants and realised that a large percentage of their costs were for the ‘talent’ they employed as radio DJs or presenters. The journey has almost ended, now that the bosses have ensured that the presenter is pointless and irritating. To ensure he remains pointless and irritating, the radio DJ is now shunted to just making ‘corporate’ announcements four times an hour rather than interacting with the listeners and the songs themselves as he used to.
The master plan is for all music-radio stations to get an agreement with Ofcom to drop ‘live’ presented radio and to go the Jack FM way. It’s only their original contractual obligations for their broadcasting licences that currently force the bosses to keep DJs there at all. Once Ofcom is convinced the DJ is pointless, then, whoosh, he’ll be gone.
All of this is a very sad long way from the days when the presenter / radio DJ was as important as the songs he played on music-radio. It didn’t matter whether the songs were new, current or old, the radio DJ was integral in hyping them up and getting the listener hooked.
We first experienced this kind of bond between radio DJ and song back in the days of the offshore radio stations of the 1960s, Radio Luxembourg, Radio 1 and the early commercial radio. In those days the idea of having one without the other was unthinkable.
Fans for the artists being played were often equalled by the fans for the radio DJ playing them. Indeed, that’s still very much the case when it comes to today’s dance and underground music.
Once upon a time the radio DJ and the music he played attracted millions of listeners.
However, this came at a huge price as far as the radio bosses were concerned. Radio DJs were able to ‘hold them to ransom’, to demand higher wages, and, horror of horrors, the listeners would notice if a particular radio DJ ‘disappeared’ and would ask embarrassing questions, even ‘boycotting’ the station or giving it bad publicity.
So, about 25 years ago, radio station bosses slowly and bit by bit removed the involvement of the radio DJ from the total sound of the radio station. Immediately, radio audiences plummeted and have never recovered. The listeners hated the radio DJ’s new role of holding back any personality and just making annoying announcements alongside the annoying commercials. The listener found the old warmth gone and the radio station cold and lonely without the radio DJ being integrated and integral to the whole ‘hype’ of the radio station’s output. Most annoying was the DJ speaking now usually telegraphed 5 or 6 minutes of commercials immediately he stopped talking. This was a deliberate ploy to make listeners hate the DJ.
Yep, subliminally the listeners truly grew to hate the radio DJs. He was no longer allowed to enhance the radio station sound, but was now one of the main aspects of the output that listeners didn’t want. So, these days, when he is removed completely, as he is with the Jack FM format, the listener numbers go up.
Along the way, the radio station bosses were able to pay less, employ ‘monkeys’, and remove all the costs associated with having important ‘personalities’ on the air. Despite the reduced audiences overall, the profits still went up.
After all, ‘profit’ is what commercial music-radio is all about. It’s not about providing the best listener experience. It’s about providing it for the cheapest so that the shareholders are happy. That’s why most radio stations are rebroadcasting the output of one centralised studio these days.
And this is also how, in pursuit of greed, the art form of the commercial radio DJ was systematically humiliated, destroyed and removed from UK radio broadcasting.


Hi Chris.
As you and I know, in the 60s it was the broadcaster and jingle package that differentiated the radio stations. They all played basically the same records but Radio London had Kenny Everett, Tony Windsor, Tony Blackburn and a superb jingle package, Caroline had Mike A’hearn, Robbie Dale, Johnnie Walker and their ‘Caroline Package' while Swinging Radio England boasted the new ‘Jet Set’ jingles Ron O’Quinn Larry Dean etc. This made the 3 stations totally different to each other and unique and captured different distinct audiences.
I think the first time I heard ‘Jock less’ music radio was on BBC Radio London, as apposed to the ship, during their drive time slot. A programme called ’Music on the Move’ non stop music with breaks every 15 minutes for the travel reporter.
It sounded fine for 10 minutes then got tedious in the extreme.
LikeLike
Jack fm….jack Shi…It will not work in this country. The Brits love a bit of old fashioned cheesey radio. If this is the direction, pirate radio will return in a big way. My opinion only……..Thx
LikeLike
Your points are well made. Paying peanuts for presenters has meant that no really creative person would choose radio as a career choice. Even Steve Wright, who is very funny, quick and sharp, is also almost totally uneducated with little general knowledge that he displays daily.
Lets not forget the heavy hand of Ofcom in all this. Half of Graham Norton's TV show would have most radio stations off the air. They have tried and succeeded in making the whole radio experience so bland, who wants to listen? I thought DC was going to axe Ofcom, pity he didn't, the common law is enough to protect the public, let radio stations say, and do, whatever they like and win or lose on commercial viability. If they are obscene the law will deal with it, if they libel people the law can deal with it, have a radio complaints body by all means, but let it be of real people. Then watch the rise of personality radio!
It is at least arguable that it is Ofcom who are to blame for it all. By insisting radio be bland and “safe” they inclined radio bosses to the liner note route and as time moved on blandness has gave way to presenters being pointless, and so here we are today with nationally crap radio. When it's all bad surely it's time to look to the top of the pyramid.
For a while I ran an automated specialist interest group on-line station for fun, it sounded live, had lots of up-to-the-minute informative stuff, but it was too expensive keeping it up to date. Considering where we are now, unless there is change at the top, I believe it has the capability to deliver. There is nothing it cannot do! With a large playlist, multiple intros, and DJ's paid to originate on a once only basis its a done deal!
I would have posted on media uk but have forgotton my login, for probably the 5th or 6th time! Copy this there if you wish.
LikeLike
I've loved radio all my life (I'm 52 now) and I hate the Jack format with a passion. If you're going to listen to music without presenter, then you just need an mp3 player.
Radio is special. It's personal and I'd hate to see it's passing. Admittedly it's getting harder to hear good radio and it seems as though sooner or later, the internet is going to be the only place you'll hear radio as it should be
LikeLike
what a load rubbish my listeners want real real radio
LikeLike
1) is “real real radio” similar to “real music for real people” like what radio caroline does? sounds all triple tautology to me.
2) I read the summary speel on the Celador web site about Jack being aimed at 25-45 years old men. I thought, this is promising I am only 49 ish and I do not like to listen to the music I grew up with all the time. So maybe unlike my local Celador station that shall remain nameless (Sheila Grant's aunt lives here), it will surely not after all play largely 80s. My flaming ar**, it's the same as the other one, just 50 times more ads without the talk. OK I lie slightly I listened for another 10 minutes and heard something non 80s. but its OK now we're back to '83 again.
If I want old music without talk I'll have Absolute x0s (x is 5 or above), radio duck or for a compromise of a little (unintellegible) talk and an anoraky feeling then obviously radiomiamigo.eu.
LikeLike
Can we resurrect “Fluff” Alan Freeman from the dead?… I would rather listen to Jack FM than that talentless turd Steve Wright.
LikeLike